Thursday, October 10, 2013

Index Fossils: How old are they?

To begin is some general questions in brief with the research that talks about that question. Then I have my writing on the topic from the Naturalistic view and the Creation view.


Is this right? Do you evolutionists agree with your position? I tried to write it as you believe it. Do you have any disagreements or concerns or additions?



Index Fossils

a.       Index Fossils are used to date rock layers. The rock layer a fossil is in dates the fossil. This is circular reasoning and based on assumptions. How do we know how old something is?

                                                               i.      http://www.genesispark.com/exhibits/fossils/dating/

b.      “Are the index fossils a reliable way to date rock layers over billions of years of history if scientists can’t agree on the classification of living creatures today?”

                                                               i.      http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/ee2/geologic-column

c.       Common index fossils include shelled organisms like Ammonites, corals, nanofossils (microscopic fossils), trilobites, mollusks and more.

                                                               i.      http://www.enchantedlearning.com/subjects/dinosaurs/glossary/IndexFossils.shtml

d.      Is the geologic column reliable?

                                                               i.      http://www.icr.org/article/242/107/

                                                             ii.      http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/change/deeptime/

                                                            iii.      http://www-tc.pbs.org/americanfieldguide/teachers/fossils/fossils.pdf

                                                           iv.      http://www.putnamscienceonline.com/fossils.htm

e.      Fossil ranges (where they are found) are increasing with more and more fossils being found.

                                                               i.      http://creation.com/the-fossil-record

f.        There have been “misplace” or “out of place” fossils in the fossil record.

                                                               i.      http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/cfl/how-fast

g.       Index Fossil Dating is not consistent with Radiometric Dating. Can either be trusted?

                                                               i.       Can we trust radiometric dating? (see section on Radiometric Dating)

                                                             ii.      http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/cm/v22/n2/geology

h.      There are many index fossils that they used to say pointed to millions of years ago that were found alive today. These are called living fossils.

                                                               i.      The Coelacanth, Gingko Trees, tuatara, lepidocaris crustacean, Metasequoia conifer tree, neopilina mollusk, lingual brachiopod, trilobite?, algae, and many more




 









Title:  Index Fossils by Brian Mariani and others

 

Introduction:

                An index fossils is a common, widely distributed fossil that is typically found in the same geologic layers or range.[i] It can then be used to give a relative age of rock layers and other fossils since they know what layer it usually comes from and therefore how old it is.

                Index fossils are mainly found in sedimentary rock. How old are they? Can we trust their estimated ages? Are they consistently found in the same place? Are index fossils being found alive today?

 

Naturalistic/Evolutionary Answer:

                “Often, the layers of rock can be dated by the types of fossils they contain... Scientists have determined the relative times of appearance and disappearance of many kinds of organisms from the location of their fossils within the sedimentary rock layers.”[ii]

The fossils preserved in the fossil record show the history and evolution of organisms throughout time. “The stretch of geologic history is commonly referred to as “deep time.”” By charting the geologic layers and their fossils, we can understand the history of the earth better and the process of evolution better. The oldest rock is estimated at over 4 billion years old and the oldest fossils being about 3.5 billion years old. The history of life can be charted from evidence in the fossil record as follows: little bacteria to algae to soft bodied organisms to an explosion of life called the Cambrian explosion to land plants and fishes to amphibians to reptiles to mammals and birds to finally everything that exists today including humans.[iii]

Common index fossils include shelled organisms like Ammonites, brachiopods, graptolites, corals, nanofossils (microscopic fossils), trilobites, mollusks and more.[iv]

 

Creation Answer:

                “The order of the fossil record can best be explained by hydrological sorting during Noah’s flood.[v]  Currents direct the different sediment types to where they will be laid down. Animals often move in herds, flocks, or groups and thus you will find similar organisms with similar organisms.

Some animals could run and climb from tidal waves for longer or fly for longer before being submerged by the catastrophic flood. Because of these abilities we see evidence for the order in the fossil record.

                Index fossils are not only found deep in sediment but some have been found still living to this day. An example of a living index fossil is the Coelacanth. This is a fish that is found in 70 million year old rocks. This fish was thought to have gone into extinction at that time and so we can date other things to about 70 million years ago, but now they are found in the Pacific Ocean. So now we can’t be sure if an organism next to a Coelacanth is 70 million years old or 10 million years old or 10 years old.

Other living fossils include the gingko tree, graptolites (300 million years old), “the tuatara (supposedly extinct since the Cretaceous Period until found still living in New Zealand), the Lepidocaris crustacean (only found as fossils in Devonian rocks), the Metasequoia conifer tree (thought extinct for the past 20 million years), the Neopilina mollusk (supposedly extinct for 280 million years), the lingula brachiopod ("extinct" since the Ordovician), and even the trilobite (chief index fossil of the even more ancient Cambrian Period).” Algae that is supposedly in 3.4 billion year old rocks still exist today...are those rocks really 3.4 billion years old?

Search “living fossil” on the internet and the list goes on and on for more examples. There is simply abundant evidence that living organisms today are practically identical to fossilized grandparents of “millions of years ago” if not “billions of years ago.” This is evidence that no evolution has taken place in those organisms.[vi]

Index fossils are the primary method of dating something. Often there are huge inconsistencies between dating based on rock layer and index fossils as compared to radiometric dating methods.[vii]

Scientists study fossils (including index fossils) and claim that evolution happens from one fossil to another, but currently there is much confusion over what a “species” actually is. A snail with a different color or shape to its shell could be a totally different species. This is simply variety within the snail kind, but not evidence of evolution. They still have the same DNA which allows that variety.

This leads to another question, “are the index fossils a reliable way to date rock layers over billions of years of history if scientists can’t agree on the classification of living creatures today?”[viii]

Ph.D. geologist Steven A. Austin also describes how index fossils often have a large range of layers where they can be found and that the geologic record has many inconsistencies of fossils and rocks in places that they shouldn’t be.[ix] There are many examples that “as more and more fossils are found, the ranges of fossils keep increasing.”[x] So those fossils are less of a pinpoint to how old something is. Austin explains how the geologic record is not as cut and dry and simple as evolution would assume by saying “strata systems are believed in some places to be inverted, repeated, or inserted where they do not belong.”[xi]

The jumbled and ordered nature of the rock layers and fossils alongside of the fact of many missing transitional fossils provide better evidence of a massive global flood rather than slow build up of layers over millions of years.

 

What the Bible Says: Genesis 6:17, Genesis 7-9

 




[i] Index Fossils, Enchanted Learning, http://www.enchantedlearning.com/subjects/dinosaurs/glossary/IndexFossils.shtml, accessed October 8, 2013.
[ii] Dating Rock Layers, Genesis Park, http://www.genesispark.com/exhibits/fossils/dating/, accessed October 8, 2013. Quoting Glencoe, Biology Textbook, 1994, pp. 306-307.
[iii] Deep Time, PBS, http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/change/deeptime/, accessed October 8, 2013.
[iv] Roger Patterson, Evolution Exposed: Earth Science, Chapter 6: Geologic Column, January 20, 2011, http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/ee2/geologic-column, accessed October 8, 2013.
Index Fossils, Enchanted Learning, http://www.enchantedlearning.com/subjects/dinosaurs/glossary/IndexFossils.shtml, accessed October 8, 2013.
[v] John C. Whitcomb and Hemry M. Morris, The Genesis Flood: The Biblical Record and Its Scientific Implications, P & R Publishing, October 20, 1982.
[vi] Henry Morris, Ph.D., The Profusion of Living Fossils, Institute for Creation Research, http://www.icr.org/article/774/, accessed October 8, 2013.
[vii] Roger Patterson, Evolution Exposed: Earth Science, Chapter 6: Geologic Column, January 20, 2011, http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/ee2/geologic-column, accessed October 8, 2013.
Andrew Snelling, Geological Conflict: Young Radiocarbon Date for Ancient Fossil Wood Challenges Fossil Dating, March 1, 2000, Answers in Genesis, http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/cm/v22/n2/geology, accessed October 8, 2013.
[viii] Roger Patterson, Evolution Exposed: Earth Science, Chapter 6: Geologic Column, January 20, 2011, http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/ee2/geologic-column, accessed October 8, 2013.
[ix] Dr. Gary Parker, Creation: Facts of Life, How Fast?, January 1, 1994, http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/cfl/how-fast, accessed October 10, 2013.
[x] John Woodmorappe, The fossil record: Becoming more random all the time, Creation Ministries International, http://creation.com/the-fossil-record, accessed October 8, 2013.
[xi] Steven A. Austin, Ph.D., Ten Misconceptions about the Geologic Column, Institute for Creation Research, http://www.icr.org/article/242/107/, accessed October 8, 2013.

Tuesday, October 8, 2013

Missing Links: Will we find them...or not?


To begin is some general questions in brief with the research that talks about that question. Then I have my writing on the topic from the Naturalistic view and the Creation view.


Is this right? Do you evolutionists agree with your position? I tried to write it as you believe it. Do you have any disagreements or concerns or additions?



1.       Missing Links

a.       Missing Links are the hypothetical intermediates between two differing types of organisms, like between humans and apes. They are termed “Missing” because they are…missing. “There are missing links all over the evolutionary tree”[i] between different kinds of organisms. How many missing links are there?  Are they still missing? Why are they missing?

b.      There should be more transitional fossils than the number of fossils already found.

                                                               i.      http://www.icr.org/article/2709/

c.       Water to Land initially? (Fish – Amphibian)

                                                               i.      http://creation.com/refuting-evolution-chapter-3-the-links-are-missing

                                                             ii.      http://creation.com/media-center?fileID=J_Oavkmvr7Q

                                                            iii.      Tiktaalik?



d.      Amphibian – Reptile?

e.      Reptile to Mammal?

f.        Land to Water? (Cow-like Ă  whales)

g.       Giraffe?

                                                               i.      http://www.weloennig.de/Giraffe.pdf

                                                             ii.      http://defendingcontending.com/2009/03/17/the-miraculous-evolution-of-the-giraffe/

                                                            iii.      http://natureinstitute.org/pub/ic/ic10/giraffe.htm

                                                           iv.      Giraffe, Incredible Creatures that Defy Evolution Vol 1 http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v5/n2/giraffe-video

                                                             v.      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMz9o9LP9WI

h.      Elephant?

                                                               i.      http://www.himandus.net/elefunteria/library/science+nature/evolution.html

i.         Platypus?

                                                               i.      http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/cm/v24/n2/platypus

j.        Dinosaurs?

                                                               i.      http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/1998/07/02/phylogenetic-chart

k.       Dinosaurs to Birds? (Reptile to Bird)

l.         Archaeopteryx?

                                                               i.      http://creation.com/That-quotemdashabout-the-missing-transitional-fossils

m.    Australopithecus afarensis?

n.      Many known hoaxed missing links or improperly identified (Piltdown Man, Nebraska Man, Java Man, Pakicetus, Ida, and Archaeoraptor)

                                                               i.      http://creation.com/darwin-fossil-ida-hype

                                                             ii.      http://creation.com/archaeoraptor-hoax-updatenational-geographic-recants

                                                            iii.      http://creation.com/missing-links-parade

o.      Horse Evolution?

p.      “The absence of fossil evidence for intermediary stages between major transitions in organic design…has been a persistent and nagging problem for gradualistic accounts of evolution.”            -Evolutionist Stephen Jay Gould

                                                               i.      http://creation.com/refuting-evolution-chapter-3-the-links-are-missing

q.      “Most species, including most horses, appear abruptly in the fossil record, change very little over their entire history and then disappear just as unceremoniously.”       -Evolutionist Johnhoe McFadden

                                                               i.      Johnjoe McFadden (Professor of Molecular Biology and Quantum Physics), Quantum Evolution, 2000, p. 71.

r.        “All 32 mammal orders appear abruptly and fully formed in the fossil record.”           -Jonathan Sarfati, Ph.D.

                                                               i.      http://creation.com/refuting-evolution-chapter-3-the-links-are-missing

s.       If a bat or bird evolved from a land animal, the transitional forms would have forelimbs that were neither good legs nor good wings. So how would such things be selected?”     -Jonathan Sarfati, Ph.D.

                                                               i.      http://creation.com/refuting-evolution-chapter-3-the-links-are-missing

t.        More Resources:

                                                               i.      http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/id/tran-nf.html

                                                             ii.      http://creation.com/missing-link

                                                            iii.      http://creation.com/cladistics

                                                           iv.      http://creationwiki.org/Transitional_form

                                                             v.      http://creation.com/That-quotemdashabout-the-missing-transitional-fossils



[i] John D. Morris, Ph.D., What’s a Missing Link?, Institute for Creation Research, http://www.icr.org/article/2709/, accessed October 7, 2013.










Title:  Missing Links by Brian Mariani and others

 

Introduction:

Missing Links are the hypothetical intermediates between two differing types of organisms, like between humans and apes. They are termed “Missing” because they are…missing. “There are missing links all over the evolutionary tree”[i] between different kinds of organisms. How many missing links are there?  Are they still missing? Why are they missing?

 

Naturalistic/Evolutionary Answer:

“There are many transitional fossils.”[ii]

Darwin’s tree of life explains how all current organisms are related to each other. Undiscovered transitional forms (Missing links) are the bridges or branches backward in time. Species evolve over time and branch out evolving into different species. So there should be a lot of transitional forms. Practically speaking, every fossil that we are lucky enough to find is a transitional fossil as organisms evolve from a previous ancestor into new species.

The number of transitional fossils is unknown. There are many factors as to why all of them have not been found. Fossilization only happens when the conditions are just right, so it is pretty rare. So fossils are pretty rare. Only a small portion of organisms even fossilize. Then most fossils are shells, but the larger organisms are more rare. [iii]

Also, only a small fraction of the available fossils have been found due to the incompleteness of the fossil record, the amount of rock to look through, and the small amount of scientists actually looking and digging for fossils. Erosion, the movement of the rocks, and non-scientific digging endeavors can cause many fossils to be destroyed and lost forever.

It is even possible that as ancient environments change, the ancient organisms tend to change or evolve rapidly to survive. The change happens so rapidly that fossils are just not preserved since again, conditions in the environment are not right to be able to fossilize and therefore preserve the organism.

More links between different animal kinds are expected to be found. Just because they have not been found yet, doesn’t mean that they are not in the fossil record.

Every year, we are finding more and more fossils. In recent years, there have been many specific transitional fossils that have been found and here are five examples among others that could be named.

                Fish to Amphibian Link:                                                                 Tiktaalik Rosae

                Reptile to Mammal Link:                                                               Thrinaxodon

                Reptile to Bird Link:                                                                         Archaeopteryx

                Land Mammal to Aquatic Mammal Link:                                Ambulocetus natans

                Quadrupedal Primate to Bipedal Primate Link:                    Australopithecus afarensis[iv]

 

Creation Answer:

                Evolution assumes that every organism has evolved and so ultimately the burden of proof should be on them to show the transitions of every type of organism. It is okay to hypothesize that there are transitional forms in the fossil record, but at a certain point, if evidence is not found, the hypothesis should be disregarded.

There is little to no evidence for the transitions of: giraffes, elephants, the platypus, dinosaurs, Precambrian to Cambrian, Invertebrate to Vertebrae, Fish to Amphibian, Amphibian to Reptile, and Reptile to Birds and Mammals.[v] Granted every once in a while, a new fossil comes out that supposedly links organisms together, but with the amount of organisms alive today, there should be more transitional fossils than the number of fossils already found.[vi]

Evolution is a process of slow change, so there should be a lot of transitions. Evolutionists solve this by saying that there was “punctuated equilibrium” meaning that evolution happened rapidly and therefore the conditions weren’t right to fossilize the transitions during that time. The lack of evidence (fossils) is their evidence for this hypothesis.

The evidence of transitions has often consisted of hoaxes or misunderstood fossils before they could be properly identified such as Piltdown Man, Nebraska Man, Java Man, Pakicetus, Ida, and Archaeoraptor. [vii]

Even Tiktaalik and Archaeopteryx are highly debated as links. There are 4-footed land animal footprints 18 million years before Tiktaalik which would show that Tiktaalik wasn’t the first link to land dwelling animals.[viii] And there have been fully formed birds found before Archaeopteryx, so Archaeopteryx wasn’t the link between dinosaur and bird. Some even say that Archaeopteryx is simply just a bird with no evidence of being part dinosaur.[ix] Many even debate if Australopithecus afarensis is a human ancestor.[x]

“The renowned evolutionist Stephen Jay Gould wrote:

The absence of fossil evidence for intermediary stages between major transitions in organic design, indeed our inability, even in our imagination, to construct functional intermediates in many cases, has been a persistent and nagging problem for gradualistic accounts of evolution.”[xi]

Here is an interesting quote from Johnjoe McFadden, an evolutionist professor of Molecular Genetics:

“Most species, including most horses, appear abruptly in the fossil record, change very little over their entire history and then disappear just as unceremoniously. This pattern is well known to paleontologists who have actually attributed it to the imperfection of the fossil record: the missing links between one species and another have all died without the decency to leave their remains as fossils.”[xii]

                Ph.D. creation researcher Jonathan Sarfati continues this thought in saying that “All 32 mammal orders appear abruptly and fully formed in the fossil record.”[xiii]

Transitional organisms may not be as well suited for their environment. For example, “If a bat or bird evolved from a land animal, the transitional forms would have forelimbs that were neither good legs nor good wings. So how would such things be selected?”[xiv]

God designed everything in the beginning, as they still are today. There is fossil evidence that living organisms have changed very little or not at all in supposed millions of years. There are small changes, but only within kinds as is already allowed for in their DNA.

 

What the Bible Says: Creation - Gen 1 (“after their kind”), Flood - Gen. 7-9

 

Add Pictures of: Missing Link Charts, Elephant Evolution, Dinosaur Evolution Chart from AiG, Platypus on the tree, Tiktaalik, Archaeopteryx, Human Ancestors,



[i] John D. Morris, Ph.D., What’s a Missing Link?, Institute for Creation Research, http://www.icr.org/article/2709/, accessed October 7, 2013.
[ii] Claim CC200, http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CC/CC200.html, Accessed October 5, 2013.
[iii] Prothero, Donald R. (2007). Evolution: What the Fossils Say and Why it Matters. Columbia University Press.
[iv] Fossil Evidence, NOVA, PBS, http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/id/tran-nf.html, accessed October 5, 2013.
[v] Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig, The Evolution of the Long-Necked Giraffe, last updated October 19, 2010, http://www.weloennig.de/Giraffe.pdf, accessed October 8, 2013.
Elephant Evolution, http://www.himandus.net/elefunteria/library/science+nature/evolution.html, accessed October 8, 2013.
Paula Weston, The Platypus: Still More Questions Than Answers for Evolutionists, March 1, 2002, Answers in Genesis, http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/cm/v24/n2/platypus, accessed October 8, 2013.
Dinosaurs: Phylogenetic Chart, July 2, 1998, Answers in Genesis, http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/1998/07/02/phylogenetic-chart, accessed October 8, 2013.
Jonathan Sarfati, Ph.D., F.M., Refuting Evolution, August 23, 2008, Creation Book Publishers, Creation Ministries International, http://creation.com/refuting-evolution-chapter-3-the-links-are-missing, accessed October 8, 2013.
[vi] John D. Morris, Ph.D., What’s a Missing Link?, Institute for Creation Research, http://www.icr.org/article/2709/, accessed October 7, 2013.
[vii] Archaeoraptor hoax update – National Geographiic recants!, March 2, 2000, http://creation.com/archaeoraptor-hoax-updatenational-geographic-recants, accessed October 8, 2013.
Carl Wieland, The evolutionary parade of ‘missing links’: The floats keep changing!, May 29, 2012, Creation Ministries International, http://creation.com/missing-links-parade, accessed October 8, 2013.
Don Batten, Darwin fossil hyper-hype, May 23, 2009, Creation Ministries International, http://creation.com/darwin-fossil-ida-hype, accessed October 8, 2013.
[viii] Jonathan Sarfati, Ph.D., F.M., Tiktaalik roseae – a fishy ‘missing link’, April 15, 2006, Creation Ministries International, http://creation.com/tiktaalik-roseae-a-fishy-missing-link, accessed October 8, 2013.
Carl Wieland, The evolutionary parade of ‘missing links’: The floats keep changing!, May 29, 2012, Creation Ministries International, http://creation.com/missing-links-parade, accessed October 8, 2013.
[ix] Gary Bates, That quote! – about the missing transitional fossils: Embarrassed evolutionists try to ‘muddy the waters’, Creation Ministries International, http://creation.com/That-quotemdashabout-the-missing-transitional-fossils, October 8, 2013.
[x] “Lucy” isn’t the “Missing Link!”, June 1, 1990, Answers in Genesis, http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/cm/v12/n3/lucy, accessed October 8, 2013.
[xi] Jonathan Sarfati, Ph.D., F.M., Refuting Evolution, August 23, 2008, Creation Book Publishers, Creation Ministries International, http://creation.com/refuting-evolution-chapter-3-the-links-are-missing, accessed October 8, 2013.
[xii] Johnjoe McFadden (Professor of Molecular Biology and Quantum Physics), Quantum Evolution, 2000, p. 71.
[xiii] Jonathan Sarfati, Ph.D., F.M., Refuting Evolution, August 23, 2008, Creation Book Publishers, Creation Ministries International, http://creation.com/refuting-evolution-chapter-3-the-links-are-missing, accessed October 8, 2013.
[xiv] Jonathan Sarfati, Ph.D., F.M., Refuting Evolution, August 23, 2008, Creation Book Publishers, Creation Ministries International, http://creation.com/refuting-evolution-chapter-3-the-links-are-missing, accessed October 8, 2013.