Is this right? Do you evolutionists agree with your position? I tried to write it as you believe it. Do you have any disagreements or concerns or additions?
Ocean Sediments and Salt
a.
There is not enough
sediment in the ocean especially if there were more time for erosion to occur.
i.
A Pocket Guide to…Best Evidences: Science
and the Bible refute millions of years, Answers in Genesis – US, 2013.
b.
Over time the ocean would become more filled
with sediments and salts, but currently the ocean is not that salty, another
evidence of a young earth.
c.
Are the estimations being
exaggerated? Are the estimations accurate? Are the estimations twisted to
present one view better than another? Who do we believe? The question is
basically: which side do we have more faith in?
1.
Numbers 13, 15, 21, 24
Title: Ocean Sediments and Salt by Brian Mariani and others
Introduction:
The ocean is
salty and full of sediments. How salty is the ocean? How much sediment is in
the oceans? Is this evidence that the earth is only thousands not millions of
years old? Why is the ocean salty? Does the saltiness of the ocean fluctuate?
Naturalistic/Evolutionary
Answer:
There is not as much sediments in the ocean, because seafloor sediments
have accumulated at a much slower rate in the past and high levels of
tectonic activity would rid the oceans of much of the sediments that had been
deposited.[i]
The slower rate of sediment
accumulation in the past may be in part due to increased desertification and
human influence on the land, like so much deforestation, loss of vegetative
cover, and simply hard use of the land. Live Science reports that “human
activity causes 10 times more soil erosion than all natural processes combined.”[ii]
Some sediment has subducted into the crust of the
earth due to the movement of tectonic plates. Sea floor spreading is the
process of the sea floor moving like a conveyor belt with new rock churning up
from below and sediments on the ocean floor funneled back into the earth under
ocean trenches.[iii]
Oceans have also been in
different places in the past and so as continents uplift, submerge or change
over time, the oceans are not constantly stacking up sediment in one place.
Ocean floor can uplift and again become landmasses.[iv]
How
salty is the ocean? “Some scientists estimate that the oceans contain as much
as 50 quadrillion tons (50 million billion tons) of dissolved solids. If the salt
in the sea could be removed and spread evenly over the Earth’s land surface it
would form a layer more than 500 feet thick .”[v]
The oceans are salty because of the sediments and
salts that are constantly washed out into the sea from off of the continents. The
oceans are not too salty because today they “probably have a balanced salt
input and outgo” because “about the same tonnage of salt from the ocean water
probably is deposited as sediment on the ocean bottom.”[vi]
The extensive size of the oceans (about 70% of the
Earth’s surface) create challenges in truly understanding everything about the
oceans. “The salinity of ocean water varies. It is affected by such
factors as melting of ice, inflow of river water, evaporation, rain, snowfall,
wind, wave motion, and ocean currents that cause horizontal and vertical mixing
of the saltwater.” It is also possible that “sea life has a strong influence on
the composition of sea water.”[vii]
“At
least 72 chemical elements have been identified in sea water” some more
abundant in certain places. Europe, for instance, contributes more salt to the
ocean than Australia. In chemistry, when certain chemicals come together, they
become insoluble (not dissolvable in water). So those solid salts will
gradually fall to the ocean floor.[viii]
Ultimately,
there are so many things going on with…the ocean, that there may be many other
factors that affect the sediment and salt content of the ocean. Rates and
estimations are approximated and so one has to be careful in evaluating,
extrapolating, and making conclusions about the age of the ocean.[ix]
Creation Answer:
“Every
year water and wind erode about 20 billion tons of dirt and rock debris from
the continents and deposit them on the seafloor.” So “the seafloor should be
choked with sediment many miles deep.” On average, there is only about 1,300
feet of sediment which is not even close to a mile deep. Sediment is known to
be lost due to tectonic plate activity, but with everything into account, that
1,300 feet of sediment would take 12 million years to form and that’s it.
However, that doesn’t cause a problem for us, because the global flood would
have caused a lot of sediment to build up initially. Over about 3 billion
years, the sediment would be “250x more sediment than we seen today.” This is a
huge difference.
The
argument that the sediments may not have accumulated that fast in the past
still has other problems. The shape of the sediments off the coast is evidence
of sediments being rushed off the continents quickly and not over a very slow
process. The underwater landscape would look totally different if it had formed
slowly over billions of years.
Ultimately
as erosion rates go, the continents would erode “into the ocean in about 14
million years.”[x]
So how do we still even have continents if the Earth has been changing for supposedly
millions and billions of years?[xi]
Part of the sediments eroding into the water is salt,
which is dissolved into sea water and that is why the oceans taste salty. So
over time, as more erosion occurs, the oceans get saltier. “After 3 billion
years, we would expect to see 70x more salt in the ocean than we see today.” 122
million tons of sodium are removed from the oceans each year, but this is not
much compared to the 458 million tons that are added each year. Current salt
levels would have only taken 42 million years to add up.
Again, to uphold an old earth point of view, one
would have to claim that the rates of change were a lot different throughout
history.[xii]
From a old earth point of view, these sediments and
salts would be devastating to the evolution of ocean and land organisms. If the
waters had too much sediment or salt, they would not be very suitable for life.
Evolutionists
have to make large, extensive assumptions about the history of the Earth, whereas
one assumption (accredited by God and history) that there was a massive worldwide
flood over a short Earth history is a simpler solution.
What the Bible
Says: Creation - Genesis 1, The Flood - Gen 7-9
Pictures to Add: Erosion, Continental Shelf, Ocean Trench, Salt
Depictions, Sediment Depictions,
[i] A Pocket
Guide to…Best Evidences: Science and the Bible refute millions of years,
Answers in Genesis – US, 2013.
Stewart E. Nevins, M.S., Evolution: The Ocrean says
NO!, Institute for Creation Research, http://www.icr.org/article/56/, accessed
October 11, 2013.
[ii] Earth
Movers: Humans Cause Most Erosion, November 3, 2004, LiveScience Staff,
LiveScience, http://www.livescience.com/63-earth-movers-humans-erosion.html,
accessed October 11, 2013.
[iii] A
Pocket Guide to…Best Evidences: Science and the Bible refute millions of years,
Answers in Genesis – US, 2013.
Stewart E. Nevins, M.S., Evolution: The Ocrean says
NO!, Institute for Creation Research, http://www.icr.org/article/56/, accessed
October 11, 2013.
[iv] Stewart
E. Nevins, M.S., Evolution: The Ocrean says NO!, Institute for Creation
Research, http://www.icr.org/article/56/, accessed October 11, 2013.
[v]
Herbert Swenson, Why is the Ocean Salty? US
Geological Survey Publication, http://www.palomar.edu/oceanography/salty_ocean.htm,
accessed October 11, 2013.
[vi] Herbert
Swenson, Why is the Ocean Salty? US
Geological Survey Publication, http://www.palomar.edu/oceanography/salty_ocean.htm,
accessed October 11, 2013.
[vii] Herbert
Swenson, Why is the Ocean Salty? US
Geological Survey Publication, http://www.palomar.edu/oceanography/salty_ocean.htm,
accessed October 11, 2013.
[viii] Herbert
Swenson, Why is the Ocean Salty? US
Geological Survey Publication, http://www.palomar.edu/oceanography/salty_ocean.htm,
accessed October 11, 2013.
[ix] Matthew
S. Tiscareno, Is There Really Scientific Evidence for a Young Earth?,
1999-2000, http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/~matthewt/yeclaimsbeta.html, accessed
October 11, 2013.
[x] Morris, J. D. 1994. The Young Earth. Master
Books. pp. 88-90.
Stewart E. Nevins, M.S., Evolution: The Ocrean says
NO!, Institute for Creation Research, http://www.icr.org/article/56/, accessed
October 11, 2013.
[xi] A
Pocket Guide to…Best Evidences: Science and the Bible refute millions of years,
Answers in Genesis – US, 2013.
Andrew Snelling, #1 Very Little Sediment on the
Seafloor: 10 Best Evidences From Science That Confirm a Young Earth, September
11, 2012, Answers in Genesis – US, http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v7/n4/little-sediment,
accessed October 11, 2013.
Stewart E. Nevins, M.S., Evolution: The Ocrean says
NO!, Institute for Creation Research, http://www.icr.org/article/56/, accessed
October 11, 2013.
[xii] A
Pocket Guide to…Best Evidences: Science and the Bible refute millions of years,
Answers in Genesis – US, 2013.
Andrew Snelling, #1 Very Little Salt in the Sea: 10
Best Evidences From Science That Confirm a Young Earth, September 11, 2012, Answers
in Genesis – US, http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v7/n4/sea-salt,
accessed October 11, 2013.
Stewart E. Nevins, M.S., Evolution: The Ocrean says
NO!, Institute for Creation Research, http://www.icr.org/article/56/, accessed
October 11, 2013.